Tuesday, March 18, 2014

The Best/Worst Thing about My Book

                     The Best and Worst Thing of The Two Towers


     The best and the worst thing about The Two Towers is the descriptive writing. The descriptive writing is beyond astonishing, "There they saw a little glittering fountain. They walked along the brim of the great bowl at the feet of the evergreens-it was pleasant to feel the cool grass about their toes again. They drank a little, a clean, cold, sharp draught, and sat down on the mossy stone, watching the patches of the sun on the grass and the shadows of the sailing clouds passing over the floor of a dingle." (108) This is great imagery and I just opened a random page and found it, I'm actually on 224. This imagery easily takes up 80% of the book which is a literary reader's dream but not necessarily mine. I enjoy action and plots which The Lord of the Rings series has a lot of potential for. This book does have action and scenes with great description and tension but I want more of it. Most of the time Tolkien is just describing the breath-taking world around them as they walk along their journey which is fine but I want more conflict and action included. I know this would make the book already larger than the immense size it already is but I would not care.

     Tolkien created a world that is similar to Earth in a medieval  and magical kind of way. Tolkien really captures the world around the characters but as I said a little too well. A book is not only written by the author but also as the reader. As they say, "Nobody reads the same book." It's a partnership among the author and reader, Tolkien eliminates a lot of that with all the description, I am not reading a book but rather being told a story. I would prefer to read a book than be told a story. The imagination is mostly destroyed in the book. I am definitely not trying to say to get rid of the description, maybe just limit it in some places and concentrate it in some other spots. With all the negative connotations out of the way now I can talk about the good things the description does in the book. The description of the characters is just amazing, "These deep eyes were now surveying them, slow and solemn, but very penetrating. They were brown, shot with green light." This is a great quote of the character Treebeard who is an Ent or a tree herder. Tolkien made the director's job very easy with all of his description and characters, the director had very little work to do.

     In conclusion I want to say that The Two Towers is a great book for literary readers and people who enjoy epic fantasy genre, just becareful with all of the description.

12 comments:

  1. First off, you have a spelling error. " In conclusion I want to say that The Two Towers is a great book for literary readers and people who enjoy epic fantasy genre, just becareful with all of the description." should be " In conclusion I want to say that The Two Towers is a great book for literary readers and people who enjoy epic fantasy genre, just be careful with all of the description."

    Second, I agree that the author and the reader write the book. If you are being told too much information, the reader does not have the space to expand on the situation. The author should think of it like Checks and Balances.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really like imagery in a book and that first quote does a great job using it. However i do agree with Jurian that too much imagery might limit how much the reader is involved with the story and make it boring. The book looks interesting though.

    ReplyDelete
  3. However i do agree with Jurian that too much imagery might limit how much the reader is involved with the story and make it boring. The book looks interesting though.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Great posting Ian. I agree that too much imagery can take away a large amount of comprehending what you are reading. Because of this quality, I think it could make a great movie. However, I feel like I would not be able to enjoy this book because it is way too long.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I read this book and I completely agree with you. Tolkien really helps visualize the world but in most spots it is excessive. I remember there was a part where he spent like 10 pages just describing a forest. It took me almost 2 months to finish the book because it kept putting me to sleep. The movies are great though. Great post!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I read this book last year, and I really enjoyed it. I also saw the movie and I liked it also. Don't worry about your spelling error, you can edit it (I think). Good job on your post

    ReplyDelete
  7. i like how you didnt just show the positives!

    ReplyDelete
  8. This book seems to have a lot of imagery, i don't really get into these kinds of books but I might read this book.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I like the details of what you inseted in your blog. This book seems interesting. Keep it up!

    ReplyDelete
  10. I love your post bro! I tried to read this book but couldn't finish it because of the descriptive writing. You're my hero.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I like how you made descriptive writing the best and the worst part about your book, it shows that you can see both sides of such a powerful writing craft. Your a boss.

    ReplyDelete
  12. The book does have a lot of imagery, but it seems like it has too much so that it doesn't help the reader in what he/she is reading

    ReplyDelete